Picture this: It's 1st and 10, and your team
has the ball somewhere between the 20's. The ball's snapped and handed
off to the RB, who plows into the middle of the line for no gain.
What's worse, this isn't the first time that this has happened in this
game. As you and the fans around you groan in disgust, you might ask,
“Who's responsible for this?” Depending on the past performance and
reputation of your assistant coaches, your answer could go a few ways.
Is it the OL coach and the players that he's recruiting/the technique
that he's teaching? Is it the OC and the plays that he's calling?
In this post, I want to discuss a third possibility by
breaking down X's and O's at the sub-coordinator level. I'm going to do
this by looking at how Steve Greatwood, our new OL coach, coaches up
his zone run schemes. We'll see that a position coach
can have a major impact on the X's and O's of the game, and can make or
break a play's success through his own schematic knowledge and teaching.
While it's ultimately the OC's job to choose what plays to run, it's
up to position coaches to make sure that each play can succeed in as
many situations as possible; a run play that can only work against one
ideal defensive look isn't very helpful for an OC, but if the OL coach
can adjust that play to make it work in a greater number of situations,
then he expands the playbook and gives his coordinator more to work
with. The coordinator himself doesn't have time to tweak individual
assignments for all eleven players on the field, and so has to rely on
his position coaches to make the little adjustments that make plays
work. With all of that in mind, let's look at Greatwood's zone running
schemes, which will illustrate this in more detail.
No comments:
Post a Comment